Revealed Preference in Decision-Making: Some Conceptual Issues

Authors

  • Dr. Somdeb Lahiri Former Professor, School of Petroleum Management, PD Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Keywords:

decision-making, consistent behaviour, Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference, Weakened-WARP, WARSP

Abstract

We show that a common and popular argument against two weaker versions of the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference arises due to incorrect framing of the decision-making problem by the decision analyst. We compare the implications of the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference with its two weaker versions and show that a violation of any of the two axioms discussed here would manifest itself in a kind of inconsistency in the behaviour of the decision maker that leads to the decision maker’s bankruptcy.

References

• Arrow, K.J. (1959): Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica, Volume 26, Pages 121-127.

• Ehlers, L. and Y. Sprumont (2008): Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules. Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 44, Issue 1, Pages 87-94.

• Lahiri, S. (2015): Rationality in a general model of choice. Journal of Economic and Financial Studies, Volume 3, No. 5, Pages 43-52.

• Lahiri, S. (2018): Sophisticated Strategic Choice. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, Vol. 14, No. 2, Pages 277-294.

• Lahiri, S. (2023): Weakened-Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference and Consistency Under Bounded Rationality in Decision Making. Artha Beekshan, Vol. 32, No. 3, Pages 3-5.

• Ostapiuk, A. (2022): Weakness of will. The limitations of revealed preference theory. Acta Oeconomica, Vol. 72, No.1, Pages 1-23.

• Samuelson, P. (1938): A note on the pure theory of consumer behaviour. Economica (New series), Vol. 5 (17), Pages 61-71.

• Suzumura, K. (1983): Rational Choice, Collective Decisions and Social Welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Dr. Somdeb Lahiri. (2023). Revealed Preference in Decision-Making: Some Conceptual Issues. Indian Journal of Ethics, Logic and Philosophy, 1(3), 10–15. Retrieved from https://www.apricusjournals.com/index.php/ijoelp/article/view/158